Whatfinger Wire News

Come to Whatfinger News' Homepage - where all of the action is - Whatfinger.com - CLICK HERE

U.S. lawmakers likely to press Powell on Fed’s ‘hawkish’ turn

By Howard Schneider

WASHINGTON (Reuters) – Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell on Tuesday will testify in a congressional hearing likely to focus on how the U.S. central bank is balancing rising inflation risks with its promise to ensure the economy recovers all the jobs lost after the onset of the coronavirus pandemic.

Until recently there was little perceived conflict between the Fed’s twin goals of restoring the labor market to maximum employment while making sure that prices rise at only a modest pace.

But since Powell last appeared before the U.S. House of Representatives Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Crisis, the central bank’s outlook for inflation has doubled. Projections released by the Fed last week showed prices in 2021 are expected to increase at a 3.4% rate, compared to the 1.7% projected as of last September.

Recent job growth, meanwhile, has been slower than hoped, with some of Powell’s colleagues now openly suggesting the pandemic prompted so many people to retire it may be unrealistic to think the economy can return to the pre-crisis level of employment before the Fed needs to tighten monetary policy.

That’s a stance counter to Powell’s own focus on returning the economy to the conditions of early 2020, and to that of the subcommittee’s influential Democratic chairman, Representative James Clyburn of South Carolina.

In testimony prepared for delivery at the hearing, Powell restated his concern that high ongoing joblessness is falling hardest on lower-paid workers, Blacks, and Hispanics. Recent high inflation was expected to prove temporary, he said, and the Fed “will do everything we can to support the economy for as long as it takes to complete the recovery.”

Clyburn, who has close ties to President Joe Biden, pushed Powell in a similar hearing nine months ago to ensure a “fair and equitable” jobs recovery, and at that point said he felt the Fed’s programs had “prioritized big business over the small ones that are most at risk … and it has failed to protect American workers.”

The economic landscape has shifted dramatically since then, and at a policy meeting last week Fed officials responded. They projected they may raise interest rates as soon as 2023, perhaps a year earlier than anticipated, and Powell said during a news conference that the central bank was beginning talks about when to pare down its $120 billion in monthly purchases of government bonds and securities used to support the recovery.

Graphic: Stronger inflation, lower unemployment – https://graphics.reuters.com/USA-FED/yxmvjaawapr/chart_eikon.jpg

Powell told reporters the economy “is still a ways off” from the progress in rehiring that the Fed has said it wants to see before making any changes, a cue that the timing of an actual policy shift remains up in the air.

But the change in tone and projections caught markets off guard, and the hearing on Tuesday, which begins at 2 p.m. EDT (1800 GMT), will be closely watched to see how Powell responds to the likely push by Democrats wanting to gauge if the Fed is hedging its job market promises, and the pull of Republicans wondering why it is not acting faster against inflation.


Since the June 15-16 policy meeting, the situation has gotten arguably more complicated for the Fed.

Market trading in inflation-protected securities showed investors expected a slower pace of price increases – and a potential loss of faith in the Fed’s stated willingness to run a “hot” high-inflation economy to encourage a full job recovery that reaches marginalized workers as well as those better off.

Graphic: An upended inflation outlook? – https://graphics.reuters.com/USA-FED/POWELL/ygdvzxxldvw/chart_eikon.jpg

Those among Powell’s colleagues who have spoken so far, meanwhile, have pushed a more “hawkish” approach, suggesting both that inflation risks needed attention, and that the job market was already closer than thought to full employment because of workers who had retired or otherwise left the labor market for good.

“The pre-pandemic level of employment is not the right benchmark,” St. Louis Fed President James Bullard said on Monday, pointing to research that as many as 2.6 million people retired during the pandemic, accounting for the bulk of the fall in U.S. labor force participation.

Retirements have “changed the calculus about the labor market dramatically,” Bullard said.

(Reporting by Howard Schneider; Editing by Paul Simao)



Your Header Sidebar area is currently empty. Hurry up and add some widgets.